Measles returns in Europe because of the anti-vaccine movement

Browse More

What are the benefits of potato rind?

Browse More

Patients with spinal cord injury return to walking thanks to electric stimulation

Browse More

US university approves use of intensive care dogs

Browse More

Tips and benefits for acquiring second-hand technology

Browse More


Celebrities Latest Post

The women who charge the most on Instagram

Models, singers, and celebrities top the list of women who charge the most on Instagram. Do you want to know your earnings? Keep reading.

A scientific study conducted by the measurement company D’Marie Analytics has revealed that these are the six most influential women in social networks. It is necessary to bear in mind that the list includes both brands and celebrities, so these six figures are even more powerful than it may seem at first. With their personal accounts, they have managed to beat entire corporations. It is logical, considering that they themselves are corporations.

In December of last year, D’Marie already surprised the whole world by publishing that celebrities such as Kendall Jenner and models like Gigi Hadid ( who is living there love to the fullest ) could be trading no less than between 100 and 300 thousand euros per each post on the Instagram social network. A not insignificant figure that, although it was overwhelming at the time, has lost its impact today. The reason? The 500 thousand euros that, according to D’Marie, the singer Selena Gomez could be charging for each publication, not only on Instagram but also on Twitter and Facebook.

In an article published in the Adweek magazine, the CEO of D’Marie Group (come on, the boss of D’Marie Group), Frank Spadafora (confirmed: has the name of the boss), said that these celebrities could be earning much more. It depends on the frequency of publication and the quality of the post among other factors.

Spadafora, whose surname alone already transmits power and threat, adds that the fact that Selena Gómez publishes so few campaigns on Instagram could be one of the reasons for her resounding success. Let’s see which are the five celebrities that follow it.

Selena Gomez

The most followed person on Instagram is a woman named Selena Gomez. And it was in The Wizards of Waverly Place as a child with a very round face. And now sing, it’s supposed. Well, that does not matter. He has many followers, WHAT IS IMPORTANT. On top of that, he just signed a multi-million dollar contract with Coach. Take it.

Kendall Jenner

The Kardashian clan had to be on this list. A social network in which appearance is everything should not be an obstacle to this company of hypermaquilladas brunettes of huge asses. To make matters worse, even strangers have left a pasture in Kendall.

Kylie Jenner

Not one, but up to two Kardashian have managed to put the cu … the head in this ranking. It must have bothered them what is not written to be behind the Texan singer. And also the fact that Kylie has been accused of stealing.


How the RiRi was not going to be! And above it should, that at least sings, pulls out records, shoes, gives concerts, and those things that Kardashians do not do.


The Diva, the Donna, is fifth. Do you think he cares? Surely, but it disguises it very well. Theirs is to claim the rights of those who need it most.

Taylor Swift

The Disney Princess reconverted to incorrigible rocker has had a complicated year due to her crossing accusations with Kim Kardashian. But it is sixth, it must be a joy. Especially being the best-paid singer.

News Latest Post

US university approves use of intensive care dogs

From the positive response of the patients, the team also plans to measure whether canine therapy produces changes in pain, respiratory capacity, and mood.

Introducing therapeutic trained dogs into hospital intensive care units (ICUs) can relieve patients’ physical and emotional damage in a substantial and safe way, according to medical experts at Johns Hopkins University.

In an article published in the journal Critical Care, experts advocate the convenience of using these dogs to help patients whose condition is not serious in light of the results of a pilot program developed in 2017 at the ICU of Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore Maryland). They also recommend other hospitals to test these ” non-pharmacological interventions “.

Dale Needham, a professor of medicine and rehabilitation and physical medicine at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, pointed out that a pet can help people in the ICU become active and commit to the goal of achieving their own recovery. as soon as possible.

“For ICU patients it would be necessary to” give them fewer drugs and rely more on non-pharmacological interventions, such as music therapy, relaxation treatment and treatment with animals. ”

Image result for Dogs

Breathers, tubes, catheters, and other technological devices that are often placed in ICU internees ” dehumanize ” and ” demoralize “, and the fact that they are usually sedated and prostrate in bed, which can cause them muscle weakness, mental confusion, depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress, Needham said.

Studies show that up to 80% of ICU patients suffer from delusions, confusion, and sometimes hallucinations while they are hospitalized, and there is also increasing evidence that these problems are reduced in more active and less medicated patients.

Therefore, after knowing the positive results obtained with the canine therapy in the rehabilitation unit of the hospital, it was decided to adopt the protocol to test it in the ICU.

The ten ICU patients who received visits from these dogs in 2017 were aged between 20 and 80 years and varied diagnoses.

Each of these patients received at least one 20-30 minute visit during their stay at the facility and in some cases, this visit included the presence of a physical or occupational therapist.

“The data show, from a psychological perspective, that dogs can help patients, for example by giving them a reason to be more active,” said Megan Hosey, assistant professor of rehabilitation and physical medicine.

The protocol developed by Needham, Hosey and other experts states that in order to receive visits from dogs, patients should be aware and alert enough to relate to the animal, not to be at risk for infection, and obviously be interested in the visit.

As for dogs, they must be registered in the Pet Partners program, which ensures that as many animals as those who care for them are up to date on the necessary preparation.

In view of the positive response from patients, the team plans to measure future experiences if canine therapy produces changes in pain, respiratory capacity, and mood.

Image result for Dogs

“As soon as a dog enters the room waiting for a pat or candy, it’s hard for the patient to resist and not get involved,” Hosey said.

Sometimes it is enough for the dog to sit close to the bed because it is a presence that calms and is affectionate, appearing to improve the mood and relieve the pain, added the teacher.

Hosey said that in the light of Johns Hopkins’ findings, other intensive care units and other departments in hospitals should consider non-pharmacological interventions and partner with organizations such as Pet Partners and Assistance Dogs International that certify the animals.

They should also focus on patients who are likely to succeed and improve, not those who are delusional or contagious.

Animal therapy is “a tool in a set designed to treat the soul and not just the patient’s body,” according to Janice Jaskulski and Stephen Wegener of Johns Hopkins and Linda Chlan of the Mayo Clinic.

Studies Latest Post

Measles returns in Europe because of the anti-vaccine movement

Measles returns in Europe, it is a reality that has triggered the alarms and that the health authorities attribute to the anti-vaccine movement.

Return to measles in Europe, with 35 deaths and 21,000 cases in 2017 according to data from the World Health Organization (WHO), one of the diseases that were believed totally controlled and can be prevented with the vaccine. And here radically precisely the reason to which health experts attribute the worrying rise of cases of measles in Europe, to the anti-vaccine movement whose message seems to have gone deeper than expected. Health authorities warn of the risks of not vaccinating children, and extensive to unvaccinated adults, regardless of where they live, and the lack of scientific evidence of the arguments on which this current is based.

A potentially dangerous anti-vaccine movement that generates distrust towards vaccines and the appearance of new outbreaks of diseases almost eradicated in many areas of the world. Measles is one of them, and the consequences of parents’ decision not to vaccinate children against measles can put their lives at risk. Measles is an infectious viral disease, highly contagious, and manifested with reddish skin rashes all over the body, accompanied by a cough, high fever (above 38.5 °), congested nose and red eyes.

Measles outbreaks in Europe

The number of cases of measles in Europe increased by 400% in 2017 with respect to the previous year (2016), in which 5,273 were registered. An increase described as “a tragedy”, in the words of the director of the European office of this United Nations agency, Zsuzsanna Jakab, in the presentation of the report in a meeting on vaccines held in Montenegro and whose figures have raised the alarm the outbreaks of measles in Europe. The WHO attributes this increase to the reduction of vaccine coverage.

In 15 of the 53 countries in the European zone, including Russia, there were outbreaks of measles, 100 or more cases. The largest number of cases was registered in Romania, with 5,562 cases; followed by Italy, with 5,006; Ukraine, with 4,767. WHO regrets that these countries have suffered a decrease in vaccine coverage. The Italian government passed a law obliging parents to vaccinate their children or face a fine.

In Spain, 152 cases were registered, far behind countries such as Greece, with 967 cases; Germany, with 927 cases; Serbia, 702; Tajikistan, 649; or France, 520.

Sanitary alert for measles

returns measles health warning

The sanitary alert for measles has once again focused on the anti-vaccine movement, despite the fact that the study on which they relied on their day to oppose vaccines was discredited and widely rejected by the scientific community. An article published in 1998 by the British ex-physician Andrew Wakefield in which he defended the relationship between the vaccine against measles, rubella, and mumps with autism. Without scientific evidence, and although the article was subsequently withdrawn and Wakefield disowned in 2010 to practice as a doctor, distrust generated a current that convinced fathers and mothers, mistakenly led by the belief that they were doing the right thing for their children’s health.

The WHO warns that the lower the vaccination rates, the greater the risk of outbreaks, requiring vaccine coverage of more than 95% of the population.

Mercury in vaccines

returns measles mercury vaccines

Another argument of the anti-vaccination movement that the health authorities have taken to the ground is that of mercury in vaccines, specifically the use of thimerosal or thiomersal, a preservative based on ethyl mercury that is used in vials containing more than one dose of a vaccine (multiple-dose vials) to prevent germs, bacteria or fungi from contaminating the vaccine, as reported by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

It is used in extremely small doses so that it is not toxic. In fact, there is no scientific study linking thimerosal in vaccines with health risks for children or adults. Currently, in Spain, none of the vaccines in the children’s calendar contains thimerosal.

You have to get vaccinated against measles

The vaccination schedule for children includes the measles vaccine, and it is essential to administer the two doses. In case of not vaccinated, and has been in contact with a contagious person, the health authorities recommend administering the vaccine within 72 hours.

Roald Dahl’s letter after the death of her daughter of measles is an almost obligatory reading for parents who still may have doubts about the efficacy of the vaccine and why there is a vaccination against measles.